BRIGITTOLOGY – a Starter Pack (BRI-SP)
Part 1: An introduction
As recounted here, I started to make an overview about the Brigitte Macron case already in February, after watching Candace Owens’ series Becoming Brigitte. Why I’m at all interested in this case, you can read here.
Apart from Candace Owens’ reporting, I don’t find much in English about the Affair Jean-Michel Trogneux. I also don’t find structured information apart from Xavier Poussard’s book Becoming Brigitte, while there is loads of information in French.
I therefore try here to give a brief overview, a sort of more structured introduction, to get an understanding of the basics of this issue that is certain to blow up in the future. Keep in mind that I have read a lot, but not studied every detail of this affair, as it is a full-time job for several months to do so. If you notice that my understanding of things as they stand today is wrong, kindly inform me of the correct facts, so I can adjust the information presented here.
The overview is quite long, broken up in 10 posts (including this introduction), but still flimsy compared to the immense amount of French material that is out there. The task is very complex, as we don’t know the real story at this moment. What we have are tons of bits and pieces, involving loads of people, who all have some weirdness going on, and all are secretive. It’s like a jigsaw puzzle with thousands of pieces, and we have quite a lot, but many are missing, and we’ve noticed that some pieces are not at all from this puzzle, or have been painted over with a different picture: it’s a huge work of sleuthing and making sense of things that don’t seem to make sense.
The main take-away is that there is almost no factual information given by Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron or their relatives about their past. On the contrary: we have testimony of people being expressly told to shut up, or being scolded if they don’t.
What is provided and said by Brigitte Macron is mostly problematic, because it contains immense hiatuses, lots of confusing and contradicting claims, almost no proof, and often outright lies that by checking a few documents can be proven to be factually false. Brigitte juggles with dates, ages and chronologies that makes one wonder if she even really lived any of it.
On the other hand, the facts and documents that have been gathered by the “Brigittologists” (the people investigating have nicknamed themselves ‘Brigittologues’) show a very strange mixture of information being deleted, or formerly absent information suddenly appearing online as if it had always been there, changing of names, signatures and places, contradictions that we are supposed to simply ignore, and everyone involved frightened to even name the subject. Normality seems almost absent and some hidden agenda and deeper connection seems to push these people’s lives.
One of the biggest indicators that something is off, is that even mainstream journalists, who want to give very positive and supportive reporting about Brigitte Macron, find a brick wall of silence when contacting relatives and former friends or colleagues, and nobody willing to testify about Brigitte’s life before she met Emmanuel Macron in the early 1990s. As Xavier Poussard puts it: Omertà does not mean that you say “I don’t know who killed Johnny”. It means that you say “Who is Johnny? What are you talking about?”.
That total black-out is the biggest proof that something is being kept hidden by all means.
If Brigitte Macron were not Jean-Michel Trogneux, it would be the most easy thing in the world to debunk. All she had to do is appear in public with him, and show some proof of her pregnancies and family life with her young kids.
Instead, she freaks out at every notion of the name, and makes everything worse with every reaction.
Nothing adds up, and it is this total lack of a consistent, chronological, factual or even credible biography, combined with all the evidence that makes no sense within or flatly contradicts the official narrative, that enforces the conclusion that both these biographies are made up, and inevitably draws the attention to the fact that what we actually do know is extremely suspicious and even incriminating.
I will discuss briefly the main points of the investigation as it presently stands.
Keep in mind that this is a developing story, and that more information comes to light little by little.
With Candace Owen’s revelation that the president of the United States, Donald Trump, personally called her to ask her to shut up about it, because Emmanuel Macron was apparently using this as a reason to block the negotiations about the war in Ukraine, shows that there is something very sinister going on here. This thing isn’t going to go away, and it is hopefully going to be a first huge reveal of the hidden reality of the satanic elite that rules our society.
For practical reasons, I have decided to make each topic a different post. The length of the posts varies tremendously, depending on the amount of available information for each topic. I know that Substack sends these posts in emails, which is quite useless as I will have to rearrange and update these posts when new information comes to light.
My goal here is to have a place online where the main points of Brigittegate can be quickly and easily accessed and understood, in order for people to quickly get a basic understanding of what the whole affair is about.
I have not numbered them, as in fact, there is no order in which these topics need to be looked into. They are simply the different main elements, and the decision on what to include and what not is made by me only. It can be that I will change the information or add posts when the need arises.
This research is far from final.
Here are the links, for easy navigating:
