BRI-SP: A huge political affair

Part 2: This goes way deeper than you would think

The issue of Brigitte Macron being born as Jean-Michel Trogneux may seem idiotic or trivial or even totally absurd and not true.

I think it is one of the bigger issues of our time.
Why do I think that?

Because

• the election of Emmanuel Macron was a scam: the media arranged it by massively promoting the couple of the Macrons as these extremely gifted, cultured, intelligent, talented, gorgeous, wonderful social people, while at the same time slandering all the other candidates as corrupt sociopaths. This fact in itself already warrants an investigation into the Macrons.
  (All elections are like this, otherwise they would not be about campaign funding and airtime. People should wake up everywhere to the fact they do not elect freely, but are brainwashed into voting for someone. This case is very clear though, as nobody had heard about Emmanuel Macron before. In this election, the fraud was clearly ‘on display’.)
  

• the information given about their lives is factually untrue and makes no sense. It is highly disturbing that so much cover-up and lying had to take place for a presidential election – the question why and what is going on here forces itself upon every honest and good-willing citizen.
  

• Brigitte Macron was sold to the public as if she were running for President herself. She is legally not supposed to have any political power. But it turns out she is actually lauded for being a major party in the Macron presidency. That fact should make all alarm bells go off.
  

• France does not know the title of “Première Dame”. Wives of presidents have no legal function and hardly anybody outside of France has ever heard about the wives of Hollande, Sarkozy or Chirac. It was exactly this same Brigitte Macron who invented this title, and crowned herself with it. There is huge political and legal weirdness going on here, that is all covered up by loud claims of her being “gorgeous”, “intelligent” and “socially engaged”.
  

• if Brigitte Macron is Jean-Michel Trogneux, then she has taken on her sister’s identity. This is a legal offence of identity theft and imposture. Even if Brigitte Trogneux would have consented to her brother usurping her identity, it still remains a crime, as consent has no place in this matter: it is a crime towards society, not just towards a person, and if the person whose identity was stolen consented, they are complicit.
  

• if Brigitte Macron is not Brigitte Trogneux, then she has been signing tons of official documents by faking her sister’s signature: another very serious crime: signature forgery.
  

• if Brigitte Macron has indeed taken on the identity of her sister, then she has concluded a marriage under a false name, which is another crime.
  If this is so, then the marriage stands void, and in that case, what is her position in the Elysée even?
  And how would it be possible for Emmanuel Macron not to know that the person he married was living under a false identity? What position can a President have who was either conned by his ‘wife’, or complicit in the serious crime of identity theft?
  

• obviously, such an offence in itself would already make headlines anywhere: a man lives as his sister for decades. However, having this be the ‘first lady’ of France, the wife of the president, is totally unheard of.
  

• Brigitte Trogneux was 39 years old when Brigitte Macron started a romantic relationship with Emmanuel Macron, who was then 14. This is a criminal offence, aggravated by the fact that she was his teacher, and hence in a direct position of power over the minor.
  

• at first, the age gap was lied about, and the mainstream press had to acknowledge that the claim of ‘he was 17, she was 36’ was a lie. It is self-evident that this was an intentional lie and not some mistake, because there is nothing easier than calculating people’s ages when you know their birth years and the date of the event. Journalists do this all the time, and changing the age here to remove the legal implications is a first huge red flag that the official story cannot be trusted and that there is deliberate manipulation of the public here.
  

• the age gap is even worse if Brigitte Macron is indeed Jean-Michel Trogneux, who is 8 years older than Brigitte Trogneux. The romantic relationship would then have been between a 14-year-old and a 47-year-old. Note that Jean-Michel Trogneux is born in February, while Emmanuel Macron is born in December. It makes the age gap almost 33 years wide.
  

• it is incomprehensible that nobody in the school where this affair was taking place took action. We are talking about 1992 here, not the 1950s. This is not a time in which protection of minors was not in the awareness of people. Brigitte Macron should have been suspended at the very least, but instead, every single person involved turned a blind eye and pretended there was nothing to see here. Why and how?
  

• the statute of limitations for the crime of ‘détournement de mineur’ is 30 years after the minor turned 18. Emmanuel Macron turns 48 in December of this year. Here also, consent plays no role. It seems there is a huge conspiracy in the media and political circles to make sure the statute of limitations is passed without any legal action started against Brigitte Macron on this issue. Again, anybody who gives a damn about the rule of law should be denouncing the fact that the Macrons are apparently ‘above the law’.
  

• all of this should be an immense scandal for people who want to live in a country that pretends to uphold the rule of law, and you would think people would want to go to the bottom of such weirdness and get it exposed.
  

• if Brigitte Macron is effectively born as Jean-Michel Trogneux, then all of the above is true, and then there is so much going on that many highly placed people cannot but be aware of it, and we have an immense cover-up going on here. No citizen of any state should be willing to accept to live in a nation that schemes and conspires against its citizens on such a scale.
  

• if this is the case, then there will also be international players who know about it, and who can blackmail the Macron regime with this knowledge, putting France in a position of being possibly forced to take political decisions, not for geopolitical reasons, but only because the president has skeletons in the closet. That’s of course not an exceptional situation, but such things are never publicly acknowledged until everybody is long gone or dead. This affair might change this and bring such scandals to light while they are still being used as blackmail.
  

• the testimony of Candace Owens that Donald Trump had personally asked her at the end of February to shut up about this issue, at the request of Emmanuel Macron himself, as a quid-pro-quo for moving forward with the Ukraine negotiations, should have the whole world up in arms. It is proof that Macron himself is using this matter for political leverage, but more importantly, that the matter is very important but not debunkable by the Elysée. If the issue is so crucial to Macron that he uses his political power internationally to pressure Trump into silencing Candace Owens, you would think they would have debunked it long before they went to such extreme measures to make people stop talking about it. Again: there is no ‘rumour’ more easily debunked than this absurd situation of someone living as their sister. It is also not at all shameful to do so, on the contrary: it would be a great victory in the public sphere.

This is not about Brigitte Macron being ‘transgender’.
This is about what on earth is going on in the highest levels of power in France.

Keep in mind that this ‘rumour’ started to circulate in 2019. Before covid. About 6 years ago. That’s not a brief moment of glory of a stupid social-media-hype that came and went because it was based on nothing and nobody cared two weeks later.

So here we are, after 6 years of this theory becoming louder and louder, with the affair having gotten a lot of international publicity – even though the European Mockingbird Media are all of course pretending it’s a stupid and completely debunked nothingburger –, and with Macron himself having admitted that this ‘rumour’ was the worst memory of his first term (which says a lot about this ‘president’, whose terms were nothing but political disaster, filled with ridicule and violent opposition).
It would be the most simple, easy, self-evident, grandiose, victorious and smacking defeat of all ‘conspiracy theorists’ for Brigitte Macron to have a huge press conference together with her brother Jean-Michel Trogneux, in which they present pictures and evidence of their earlier lives.
Everything would be solved in one single instant of total glory and vindication.
Yet Brigitte Macron does nothing of the sort.
The only thing we have is more censorship, legal attacks, and state media that desperately shouts there’s nothing to see here, without giving the tiniest bit of counter argument.
The whole reaction is only, purely, name-calling and harassment.

This is the key to this whole affair: the absence of actions, proofs and debunks is thunderingly loud, and is in fact the clearest indication and testimony that the theory is right on the mark.

While looking into the matter, one will find that, indeed, the most direct proof we have, and the most disturbing, is the total refusal to provide the relevant documents. If Brigitte Macron is truly Brigitte Trogneux, and not Jean-Michel Trogneux, then why

• have they not once appeared in public together?

• are ALL of the school pictures of Brigitte Trogneux illegally refused to be made public?

• are many of the school pictures of Jean-Michel Trogneux illegally refused to be made public?

• was Jean-Michel Trogneux deleted from the Trogneux family’s online genealogy information, only to suddenly appear AFTER his existence had been proven by the Brigittologists?

• did the Amiens municipality TWICE inform Natacha Rey that Jean-Michel Trogneux was not born in Amiens, and hence they could not provide her with his birth certificate?

• does nobody provide a single picture of Brigitte Macron as pregnant or with any of her alleged three babies?

• does nobody provide a single picture of Brigitte Macron with her children and first husband? A normal family picture? ANYTHING showing Brigitte Macron’s alleged family life?

If this ‘rumour’ is a fake, stupid, idiotic conspiracy theory, then why are we still talking about it, in 2025? And louder than ever?

<Back to the BRI-SP Introduction