The mysterious affair at the Élysée
Telegram post 79
At the beginning of last week, I was banned from yet another Telegram channel's chat. This time it was L’affaire Jean-Michel Trogneux, dedicated to the Brigitte Macron scandal/investigation/truth seeking. (Can’t link, as the channel does not show up in my search anymore now, I guess because I got banned and left the channel itself also.)
There was weirdness going on in the chat, with mainly 2 people commenting loads of stuff, and clearly having inside info or being related to the sleuths dealing with the issue. One of them seemed to be even the owner of the channel, or at least one of the admins.
This person (“Mio”) was making all kinds of claims that made me ask who he/she was. “Mio” didn’t asnwer, but became even more mysterious by replying “that has to remain a secret for now”.
The channel had been posting extremely irregularly, with sometimes months of silence. But since Candace Owens had started to air her series Becoming Brigitte, the channel got new life and posted every time Candace dropped a new episode.
Strangely enough, many of the comments by “Mio” and “Marje” were clearly not supportive of Xavier Poussard. I had no clue about much, but there was a link to an interview with Natacha Rey (the first woman to go viral with a video conversation about Brigitte Macron being Jean-Michel Trogneux (JMT), and having stolen her sister Brigitte’s identity), who is being vilified in France and attacked by the Macrons for, as Candace said, some silly errors that have nothing to do with the core issue. The MBM have screamed from the rooftops that she was convicted for defamation against both Brigitte Macron and JMT, while totally “forgetting” to report that the lawsuit was never about the claim that they are one and the same person, but about Natacha claiming that the birth certificates that she had been given by the local administration had been tampered with or forged, and a few more claims of alleged sideline things that Natacha is supposed to have said (which was not proven). (Natacha’s lawyer made the very astute comment in court that if both of these people (neither of whom ever showed up in the court room of course) are offended by the exact same words Natacha said, it looks as if they are one and the same person, doesn’t it?)
Obviously, with all 3 judges appointed by Macron (as the president) to decide in a case brought by his wife, Natacha was convicted even though nothing got proven and the verdict is flimsy, almost whimsical.
The link posted in the chat went apparently to a video in which Natacha complains that Xavier Poussard stole her research, for which he is now getting all the credit in Candace’s viral videos, and based on which he wrote the book that’s becoming a best-seller in no time.
“Mio” was also making claims that the big reveal in the book of a newly discovered picture of JMT at 18 years old, looked a lot like “le petit gros”, the short fatty who the Élysée at a very late stage suddenly claimed to be “the real” JMT.
I started noticing that a lot of the comments by these two main chatters were actually totally undermining the whole theory that Brigitte Macron was born JMT, positing instead she was quite male-looking and had surgery done to correct this, and was too embarrassed to admit this in public. A theory that is completely idiotic, as it solves exactly none of all the problems with her past, and is immediately debunked by one of the first pictures that were released after the scandal broke: Brigitte’s 1974 wedding picture. There’s nothing male in the features of the bride at all.
“Mio” also claimed Candace would stream her interview with Xavier Poussard later that night, and that the picture would feature in it. Which did not happen, so I commented, “Félicitations pour vos prédictions. 100% à côté de la plaque!” (Congrats with your predictions. 100% wrong!)
Someone gave it a like, but when I checked later that day, I was banned.
I wanted to quickly post that the same day, but started to give background about the affair, had to check stuff online. And then I fell into the rabbit hole again.
